


Read the following passage and Choose the best answer :
The Anarchists and Marxists have defined the state as an instrument of coecion which suppresses individuals, groups in society in the interests of particular dominating classes. the definition is incomplete based on the observations of some political authorities. The states in such primitive societies, whether of the past or of the present are either unitary or proto democratic in character. Second, even in the class societies we find arsighted rules who make laws unfavorable of the interests of the dominating classes. Third, there are numerous instances, even in rigid class societies, of people having risked everything including their lives, to defend the states against the dangers facing them. Fourth, most far-sighted rulers and political thinkers have recognized that the state can have stability only on the besis of voluntary consent of the people, All these considerations show that the state is not always and simply and instrument of class oppression.
The writer says except—
state is stable if people willingly obey it
people in class societies risked their lives to defend the state
in a state dominating class dictates
there were classless society in primitive times
প্যাসেজে আদিম সমাজকে 'unitary or proto-democratic' (ঐকিক বা আদি-গণতান্ত্রিক) হিসেবে উল্লেখ করা হয়েছে, কিন্তু সেখানে কোনো 'classless society
Log in to add your own explanation
যে সকল বিগত বোর্ড ও প্রতিযোগিতামূলক পরীক্ষায় এই বিষয়ের প্রশ্ন এসেছে:
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
যে সকল বিগত বোর্ড ও প্রতিযোগিতামূলক পরীক্ষায় এই বিষয়ের প্রশ্ন এসেছে: